SEND This Site To Someone You know.

CHAPTER 2

I say unto you now, to EACH of you in whom the spirit of Zion is held in your heart, and to those who need yet to repent,  .  .  .

THY GOD REIGNETH, SCIENTIFICALLY . . .

FROM MY BOOK - “WHERE NO MIND HAS GONE BEFORE.”

DISPROVING EVOLUTION AND RADIOACTIVE DATING -

A NEW THEORY . . . . . .  With a new theory explaining Ice Ages.

        GOD IS VERY REAL - SCIENTIFICALLY - IS ALIVE,               AND REIGNETH

 The millions-of-years theory claims to be tied to evolution, and evolution is tied to the radioactive dating theory.  It is because of the radioactive dating theory claims that the supreme Court of the United States holds fast to the allowance of the teaching of evolution in public schools, because of the claims of the scientific world as to its apparent stability, and because no one has yet been able to provide a quantum physics counter theory as to the invalidity of radioactive dating, since no one has been able to provide any evidence whatsoever that there is anything in nature that can either speed up or slow down the process.

 I would like to offer a theory based on certain facts that I believe, in time, could become just as tenable as the ones currently accepted by the courts of the United States.  To further your understanding, I have included two pages from a college level geophysics textbook that I came across back in 1980 while researching through a small college library.  I was so amazed and excited by what I had found, that I forgot to get the name of the book.  I only copied a few pages therefrom.  Perhaps someone else will recognize the two pages and will give a name to the book that they came from.
===================================================================

___________________________________________________________________________

 

__________________________________________________________________________

 First, let us examine the radioactive dating theory.  It centers around a fact; the fact of half-life (the rate at which a radioactive material will decay, leaving only one-half of the amount that it originally had), the strongest argument for both evolution and the proclaimed oil shortage.   Some radioactive materials have been found to have half-life decaying periods that run into hundreds of thousands of years.  Certain of these radioactive materials are known to be found in objects of both an organic and an inorganic nature, in natural and established amounts.  Therefore, if a man’s leg bone, for example, is known to have a full gram of radioactive material, say radioactive material X, whose half life is say 500,000 years, and man’s leg bone was found which had only one-half (½) of radioactive X contained in it, because up to this time the scientific world has discovered no known process in nature to either speed up or slow down its decay, it would be analyzed as being 500,000 years old.  For the courts, this appears to be so strong that in the face of nothing else to the contrary, they will not and have not ignored it.

 But suppose there was something in nature that could change the decay rate itself in a kind of extraordinary way.   If it were discovered that such a process did exist, the courts would be forced to reconsider their standing on evolution an other related matters.  (Bear in mind that this in no way relieves them of their legal obligations as discussed in Chapter 1.

 Let us consider the following:

 The subatomic particles of an atom.  Now, do not worry about not having a great understanding about the atom (although if you think you do that is certainly all right); if you do, or think you do, you will need to rid yourself of some of those ideas that are barriers to what really is taking place in the scientific universe and what some believe to be taking place.  Nevertheless, I am trying to make this simple, for it actually is rather simple anyway.  The structure and therefore the quantity of any element, even a radioactive element, is dependent upon its number of protons (atomic number).  If protons are therefore either removed or changed, even temporarily, the atomic number becomes changed and the actual elemental amount of the actual material also becomes changed, even in, or perhaps especially, radioactive elements.

I propose the two (2) following phenomena:

        1. The neutron is a “frozen” proton . . . . . .

        2. There IS a condition currently in nature that can cause the “freezing” of these protons into neutrons, and have caused such “freezing” to occur at various times throughout the history of the world.  This process of such “freezing” is called “subatomic freezing.”  Subatomic freezing does not relate to any thermal temperature currently perceived by scientists, including that of “absolute zero.”  Subatomic freezing relates to the “temperatures” that exists between the very atoms and subatomic particles themselves.

 To better understand certain things, you should be aware that in 1979 I discovered a new field of physics, a physics which I called Umbral Physics.  Umbral Physics is the study of the tendency of void upon matter.  It is the study and realization of the kinds of matter a tendency of void upon matter produces, or can produce.  It’s realization reveals for the first time the true nature of time and space, now referred to as Black Body Conservation Energy, or BBCE.  BBCE is the essence of what was thought to be back in the Nineteenth Century as ether (not the gas).  BBCE regulates the speed of all forms of matter according to the mass, but without regard to the direction of the source.  But the field of BBCE may be varied, depending on where in the universe it may be found to have been created or organized.   Because of this, there are different fields of BBCE that may exist at different intensity or density levels.  On the page below, the different levels of BBCE are somewhat illustrated.  The level C^: is identified as Time Frame One, for it relates to the speed of light as it applies to our particular part of the universe.

 I now reiterate my earlier proposal that a proton can be changed into or given the characteristics of a neutron by decreasing the subatomic temperature through an increased umbral influence, that is, the rest mass will increase from 938.280 MeV to 939.573 MeV, a significant difference of 1.293 MeV, coming closest to the Mu-Meson (Muon) as found in the Leptons class at 106, just above the electron at .51 MeV.  This is similar to the way water, on a molecular basis, expands upon freezing, although the circumstances involved in water-ice expansion are somewhat different.  Nevertheless, consider the effect of blotting out the sun from the earth.  Subjected to extreme cold, the entire atmosphere would freeze, becoming ice from the many different gases within the atmosphere, collapsing and surrounding the perimeter of the earth with a solid layer of these ices, and giving this perimeter an increased dimension and applicable new mass (measuring the earth itself in comparison to before the freezing effect was applied, for the measurement of the mass of a planet does not take into account the specific gases in the atmosphere anymore than the mass of a subatomic particle takes into account the actual energy field that surrounds, but is not a tangible part of it).  This is the conditions established by Umbral Physics as discussed earlier.

 Continuing on - a neutron being a frozen or umbral state of a proton, would explain the relative neutrality of the neutron and also the stronger close range bonding ability of the neutron.

 The neutron is a frozen proton!  There is a very peculiar relationship between the neutron and the proton.  To understand what this relationship is, we must first understand some basic principles regarding mass.  If density is increased in any given type of matter (matter A), reducing its area or outer perimeter, and other adjacent matter (matter B) is pulled into and combined with matter A, until it is restored to the same outer perimeter that existed before densification, the mass of the matter has definitely been increased.

 Cold causes the densification of gases, hence liquification or freezing.  Densification concentrates particles into a closely associated area, forcing a condition of physical bonding, and creates, for all practical purposes, a mass (certainly greater than any mass that existed in the area before densification) where there was none, or increases or creates (organizes) the mass in that specific area.  And if other foreign gases or particles of matter are drawn into and combine with the densifying  gases, there is definitely a greater mass in the targeted or referred to area than might have otherwise been expected to be there or calculated for.

 Water, when changed from a liquid into a solid (ice) increases its outer perimeter (expands) with force.  Ice (0º C) and water at temperatures greater than 4º are less dense, wherein the ice will float in the water.  At least on the part of the ice it would appear that it is less dense, even though it is known that it has expanded its perimeter, and exerted a force outward.  Consequently, it (the ice) appears to be less dense.  This is due, at least in part, to the idea that the water in forming ice crystals form them in such a way as to trap free particles (radicals) of oxygen, thus merely giving the simulation or appearance of a less dense material, and because the extra matter combined or trapped between the crystalline particles is oxygen or in essence an air-like gas, the ice tends to float.

 But water, changed into ice, has the power to exert a force against its surrounding containment and in some cases to cause breakage in that containing structure, which is certainly an indication toward the idea that the ice exhibits properties of an increased mass, not a lesser one, regardless of what is currently thought about density and mass of water as ice.

 Fish, swimming in water, draw oxygen from the water, water that is oxygenated of course, which all water is in its natural state until something like a fish, with the ability to remove the oxygen from the water, is put into it, removing the free or extra oxygen by using their gills, illustrating that there is more than just a little free oxygen contained in water, unless you choose to believe that the gills of a fish can somehow cause the very separation of the oxygen and hydrogen atoms themselves,  from the water itself, releasing hydrogen as a gas thereby.  Additionally, water poured over meat and vegetables in a food store will show a definite increase in weight (and mass), particularly if frozen afterwards.  In both of these examples, the adding or combining of additional materials to the original materials changes the nature of the product or item which must be dealt with, particularly when the extra material is held in place by an outside force or energy.

 Cold, then, by process of densification and combination, can cause the organization of an increase of mass, under certain conditions, of certain substances of matter, partly at the very least to the crystalline structure pertaining thereto.  Again, the neutron is a frozen proton.  The neutrons have a relationship unique to them.  For example, the mass (a type of atomic measurement) of a neutron at rest (when it is stable and not changing into anything else) is approximately 939.5 M.e.V. (million electron volts - the method that scientists use to measure atomic mass since it can’t be measured using common measurements) whereas the mass of a proton at rest is approximately 938.2 M.e.V., only slightly smaller than the neutron.  The neutron is only slightly larger than the proton, as though it has a little extra matter on board, much the same way that water as ice seems to have a little extra matter on board.  It is the freezing process or the state of being frozen that makes this very factual and scientific adjustment or change in the mass itself.

 Again, consider this.  Take a subatomic particle of considerable size, say a Lambda particle, whose life is not stable but whose mass at rest is 1815 M.e.V., a rather large particle as atomic particles go.  During its course of decay it will reach different points of rest mass, none of which will generally be permanent or stable.  Finally it will reach a certain point where either one of two things will happen.  (1) It will either become a neutron for 1,013 seconds, after which it will decay further decay to produce a proton and a neutrino (another very small subatomic particle), or (2) it will produce a proton and a neutrino without first becoming a neutron.  This demonstrates a definite relationship between the two, the neutron and the proton.  And what exactly makes this determination factor between the “choice” of which one result it is to become or in which order it is to process to, is a fact that scientists are still, to this date, not sure of.

 If the earth were removed from orbit around the sun into distant space away from any star, its temperature would drop to absolute zero, at the very least, and its circumference, or the actual mass of the planet itself (not normally including the gases surrounding a planet as being a part of the planet’s mass), would increase because the atmosphere surrounding it would freeze and collapse around it, bringing new matter to the surface, increasing its surface area or perimeter, increasing the amount of mass at the surface of the earth itself.

Again, I propose that subatomic “temperatures” are likewise possible, and are a matter of analytical fact and conclusions of true science and scientific fact, causing changes in behavior patterns of such subatomic particles.  The common occurrence is for a higher particle, while decaying to become a neutron, then a proton, and to reverse this process, causing a proton to become a neutron would require enormous energy.  However, if such an energy were found to exist in nature, it would stand as evidence that in any artifact found to have less than the normal amount of radioactive X, the half life could not be determined anymore by half life calculations, since an atom, when or if suddenly overloaded with neutrons, will begin to pulsate and then ultimately dissipate.  Thus, in the event that massive subatomic “freezing” produced massive neutron amounts or surges around the remaining protons (if any), which produced massive numbers of atomic nucleus dissipation (I believe that radioactive particles would be more susceptible or vulnerable here because of their increased mass exposure to the subatomic “freezing” conditions or process), then the calculations as to the age of anything, even the earth itself, could not be determined by any form of radioactive dating.  An alternative theory to the idea that a neutron overload causes dissipation, is the theory that the newly converted neutrons, being neutral, simply drift away, reducing the total radioactive material content.  Perhaps this concept is similar, somewhat, in nature to what has happened in the development of the theory of “cold fusion.”

 But does any power or energy on the face of the earth exist in nature that could cause such an occurrence?  I sincerely believe it does.

 The answer to this question came to me in 1978 from geology professor, Dr. Kenneth Exum, when he stated, “Every hundred or two years or so, an amazing phenomena occurs in the earth.  The magnetic north and south poles change places.”  Astounding!  I knew that this had to be part of the answer.  But I knew that there was more.  I realized that if there could be such magnetic currents in the earth as these, there could be more, but not necessarily in the same direction, same kind or same strength, and not even stable or permanent in direction, say the kind that would cause the creation of a loadstone here and there around the earth.  What if, I hypothesized, after much longer periods of time, a large number of magnetic currents aligned themselves up with the north and south magnetic poles or magnetic currents running through the earth, coupled with any gravitational currents, constituting a uni-omni alignment, and then changed places?  Alternated Directions?    Of all inclusive of possible intra-earth energies and full power force?  The amount of energy calculable in such circumstances would be absolutely fantastic.  According to Dr. Kenneth Exum, the amount of energy in a single hurricane, far above the earth's existent gravitational and magnetic forces, is more than the energy in then (10) atomic bombs such as the one that was dropped on Hiroshima.   The amount of energy running through the Earth’s core then, would be, and is simply incalculable!  No man-made atomic generator of any kind has ever approached or could be expected to approach it.  And I believe that such phenomena does actually exist, as is evidenced by not only the existence of ice ages which geo-physicists have never been able to explain, but the issue of glacial pull across mountains, not drift the way it has been explained by some scientists not fully understanding this phenomena, and I believe further that it is a phenomena strong enough to cause subatomic freezing, molecular freezing or normal freezing and something that, according to Dr. Exum, scientists cannot and have still not ever been able to explain: Ice Ages.  The sudden existence of massive amounts of ice on the surface of the earth.  And being pulled, not just melting and moving, causing the crushing of entire mountains!

Consider for a moment some scientific ideas (reasoning) and facts.  The shifting of magnetic currents through the earth is like the shifting of electricity in direction through a wire in an alternating current (A.C.), though nowhere near as fast or as frequent.  While the current is flowing fully in either direction, there is a magnetic flux (or field) around the wire.  But as it changes directions, that magnetic flux collapses back into the wire, causing counter-electromotive forces in the wire.  Since explosion represents forces expanding rapidly outward (from which much heat is released), the collapse of the magnetic flux or field into the wire would represent implosion (the opposite of explosion).  Implosion into an object of matter is the kind of force that can cause freezing since it is an energy moving within a material having the opportunity to draw away energy from that material in its natural state, and Uni-Omi Implosion is the kind of force that can cause both molecular and subatomic freezing.  Drawing away (heat) energy from a material in its natural state is what freezing, in many principles of scientific phenomena, is all about.

Gravity is very specifically this very principle of “drawing” energy in a specific linear direction.  In fact, this Potential Energy Quantum, or gravity, exerts a massive pull inwardly, and has all the necessary properties to induce subatomic freezing to cause the changes in the earth resulting in the changes or expediting of the radioactive decay rates of the elements (all of them) that have come into question or focus relevant to the issues of the true age of the earth.

But is there anything in nature that indicates freezing ability of these magnetic and gravitational forces magnitudes in the earth?  I answer, most definitely, “yes, there is.”  Once again, Dr. Kenneth Exum thrust still another fact upon me and upon my world.

From his amphitheater class one day, in front of a hundred students, he proclaimed these sobering and enlightening words: “Eighty-five (85) percent of the Earth’s ice is at Antarctica (I learned afterwards that it is actually ninety (90) percent, ten percent (10 %).. {actually only about 5 %} is at Greenland, and five percent (5 %) is divided up between the Arctic Circle and the rest of the world.”  (Although the existence of the Antarctic ice cap in such proportions is certainly hard evidence of the existence of freezing caused by massive quantums of energy, it is not necessary to consider it as required proof of the reality of subatomic freezing.  The reality of the existence of subatomic freezing can stand on the merits of its own logic.)  Afterwards, I asked Dr. Exum to repeat it, which he did.  Could this be the missing clue as to the existence of the largest freezing power on the face of the earth?  I knew at once that it was.

Consider the following scientific facts dealing with climate, weather, and geology.  In the summer time (when it is hot in the northern hemisphere of the world) the northern continents receive more warmth than at any other time of the year because the sun is more directly overhead (further north) although it is further away from the earth.  In the winter time, the reason we would have cold weather is because the sun’s rays are coming to us from the south at an angle, and are filtered out by the Earth’s atmosphere, because the sun has moved further south, but it is closer to the earth, particularly closer to Antarctica!!  And also, more direct to Antarctica at that time!!

To be more specific, although it is generally said that the earth is about 93,000,000 miles from the sun, it is about 91,500,000 miles from the sun in January, its Perihelion, and about 94,500,000 miles from the sun during July, its Aphelion, a difference of about 3,000,000 miles.

The sun delivers and maintains a temperature to the earth of about 180º F.  An average decrease or increase, respectively, of the earth’s temperature by only 20º F would make most of the Northern Hemisphere too cold, or most of the Southern Hemisphere too hot to live in.

The earth’s equator is inclined at an angle of 23º 27,' which tilt gives rise to the climatic zones on the earth, and through the annual changes in the amount of heat received from the sun, the seasons.

When the position of the sun in relation to the earth is at winter solstice on around Dec. 22 - 24, it is at its most southern point in relation to the earth, and on about June 20 - 22, the sun is at its summer solstice and is at its most northern point in relation to the earth.

Because the direction of the earth’s axis remains unchanged, the north pole is tipped away from the sun or toward it, according to the position of the earth in its orbit, and during the winter solstice, the southern hemisphere is tilted towards the sun and the northern hemisphere is tilted away.

At no time is the sun as close to the most northern part of the world as it is to the most southern part!  By all known laws of physics the heat from the sun - [notwithstanding the fact that a small part of Antarctica sits on a land mass (I once had someone try to explain it away by saying that it was because of the land mass under the Antarctic cap, and I told them that, excuse the pun, that theory wouldn’t hold ice water, for if the land mass was the reason and the magnetic and gravitational forces played no real part in it, then why not Greenland?  Why wouldn’t Greenland be the place to contain the world’s largest ice cap since the northern countries, regardless of the fact that they may not be at the extreme north end of the earth itself, are also land masses and are exposed to far more ordinary cold)] - should be melting the ice cap at Antarctica like a fluffy winter snow in the heat of the Sahara Desert in its hottest summertime.  And the northern area of the world should be literally covered with ice and not just a mere less-than-five percent!  Unless something else is causing that freezing in Antarctica!?!!

The earth, like any magnet, must have one end where the magnetic (or Potentionic) forces are drawn in (Antarctica) and another end where such forces are expelled outward (the Arctic Circle).  Notice that it (the Arctic Circle) is a “circle” with no real ice cap, not because of the lack of a land mass (the science of plate tectonics or continental moving suggests that if the attracting forces were in place there, that the land mass could be there also), but because there are lines of flux being expelled outward in this region, and the heat and the subatomic “heat” prevents any ice or land mass from forming or actually being there.  But at Antarctica, the lines of flux are being drawn in, hence freezing and a massive ice cap.  Further, it should be noted here that in principles of magnetism, heat energy can neutralize magnetism, whereas with magnets, the colder that magnets get the better they work!  (This is not to say that this, because of the existence of BBCE and Umbral Physics, is an absolute.  Even subatomic cold has its limits with a particular Time Screen or Field as pertains to a particular part of the universe.)  That is because magnetism is actually more of a specialized principle of operation just as gravity is; a specialized principle that works better under cold conditions because it has the ability to produce cold conditions; it is indeed harmonious to cold conditions.  But I do not believe that it is the magnetic poles themselves that cause such freezing.  I believe it is rather more probable that the forces that cause such freezing are more at gravitational in nature, and are the major part of the cause of Ice Ages and subatomic freezing during the transitional shifts of the Earth’s poles.  The energy in such an occurrence simply cannot be calculated or measured by any known instrument.  I propose that such occurrences of major shifts occur only every two (2) to four (4) thousand years, and will vary in strength, one from another (for additional on the next major shift probability, see the chapter on “Dinosaurs” in the latter part of this document.  I also cover this issue more thoroughly in my book titled “Where No Mind Has Gone Before.”}

I am aware of many claims as to how Antarctica happens to have such a massive quantity of ice deposited thereat, but I have heard or studied nothing of any credible value, everything from underground ocean streams (the Gulf Stream theory, etc.) to the existence of the land mass itself.  This latter one is the one that makes no sense at all, because it, again, relies on the lack of proper sunlight in that region of the world in comparison, as a matter of equality or proportionality, to the lack of proper sunlight in the northern hemisphere of the world.  I suppose by this form of so called logic, since at points removed, or at a distance from the central point of the Arctic Circle, in direct ratio comparison to that same distance from the central point of the Antarctic ice Cap, should be rather warm, Alaska should not exist as an extremely cold climate any more than Brazil; Canada should be steaming warm, and New York state and other comparable states at equivalent latitudes should now be a toasty warm all year long.  Anyone for sunbathing outdoors in Rochester in January?

In a conversation that I had at one time with a man who was stationed (militarily) on the land mass of Antarctica itself, who was also a weatherologist and therefore somewhat knowledgeable about some of the conditions that exist there, because of the Coriolis force, brought on by the spinning of the earth on its axis (though not as a matter of centrifugal force), water will not cross the equator, and the equator itself is not the warmest place on the earth to propose that a warm stream of water originate from.  And I also learned and have now come to understand that, amazingly, the ocean currents themselves (by whatever name), because of the existence of that same Coriolis force, move from the Poles to the equator and not from the equator toward the Poles, further breaking apart the theory of water or underwater stream warming of the region of Antarctica, or even the southernmost South American continent region as a viable solution to explain what is scientifically going on in that specific part of the world.

In fact, according to this same weatherologist that I spoke to, hot geothermal springs exist right on the land mass of Antarctica itself in direct contrast to the great amount of cold that exists there just a short distance away, warm enough in fact that on occasions, people who have visited that part of the world have been known to take outdoor baths in the Wintertime there!  Bear also in mind that one of the results of the known refrigeration process is the release of heat on the one hand while the process of heat removal is taking place nearby, causing the cold producing process to take place in a sort of "heat exchanger" form, which provides us an explanation as to how or why hot geosprings would be formed in that part of the world from within the earth's core itself.

And as this very sharp weatherologist put it so succinctly to me upon our discussion, the tracking of the weather and its causes, and all of the difficulties and unpredictable variables thereof,  pretty much all arise from activities originating within the earth itself, much more so than conditions that arise from the sun itself from an outer space, or even an atmospheric, condition or direction.

Another already existing and claimed scientific explanation for the coldness of the Antarctica region that I have become aware of and on which I need to briefly touch upon here is referred to as the Albite Reflectivity of the Earth theory, or the reflection away of the sun’s light by the preponderance of white ice's reflectivity theory.  There is a Problem, however, that scientists have with this theory.  It is known as the old “getting the cart before horse” fact.  That is to say, the theory that it is the great preponderance of the earth’s ice reflecting the sun’s light away from that region of the world which thus causes (or caused) the entire region to become colder than its Arctic Circle counterpart fails inasmuch as it cannot be used to sustain a claim that it was the whiteness of the ice that made it extra cold in that region in the first place, when there would have been no such amount of ice to bring such abnormally required conditions on to begin with.  In short, it raises the question of which came first, the temperature or the ice.  And as to paradoxes, it would automatically produce the scientific claim of reality that would require other, unknown scientific factors operating in conjunction with both the temperature and the ice to bring it about any other way.    Thus, except that there is some other mysterious scientific process at work, such as I have an am proposing, no scientific paradox can exist here under these conditions before specified.

Further, because of the existence of the obvious warming of the land mass itself, whether from the heat released from the existence of the geosprings themselves there, or from the existence of the warm ocean streams that touch upon that continent there (remember the tropical fish?), or from the revelation of newly discovered scientific fact which is about to follow below, the fact remains that no significantly greater volume of ice should have or could have formed in order to accomplish the required goals of the reflectivity theory.  Keep in mind also that the sun itself is both closer to the earth and more directly overhead over the Southern Hemisphere at certain times of the year than it is to its Northern Hemisphere counterpart.

NOW, on the following page, I have included an illustration designed to show the mathematical difference in terms of atmospheric filtering against sunlight.  In reviewing this, there are a number of things that one must bear in mind.  First of all, the sun is positioned at different distances from the earth at different times of the year.  If it were the same at all times as shown on the one side of the illustration, then all of the climatical weather in both lateral regions of the world would be exactly the same, from a sunlight-affecting standpoint.  Second, the difference between the farthest two points of the travel of the sun amounts to about two million miles, a seemingly great difference, with the farthest point of distance being at the Northern Hemisphere, not the Southern Hemisphere - however bearing in mind that because of the lack of any real filtering process offered by space (the BBCE does not serve in this capacity in this instance), this variation in distance does not offer any appreciable variation or difference of climate on the earth, since all of the heat or "thermonic" energy arrives at the point of entry into the earth’s atmosphere only moments later.  So, it is not the difference in the distance in miles from the sun to the earth’s atmosphere that creates the difference between the two polar regions; instead it is the difference of the number of miles of atmospheric filtration that causes each polar end of the earth to be so drastically different, one from the other, and to that same extent, it should be the cause (to some extent) behind the heating of the various ocean streams, although as we now know, part of this comes from the undersea volcanic activity, derived from the forces at the center of the earth.   But the problem (for previous evolutionists theorists) with the idea that the earth’s atmosphere should be the determining factor between how much warm climate exists at each polar point is that the decrease in atmospheric filtration at the point or angle of entry of sunlight when the sun is at its northernmost point, is in favor of the southernmost point, or Antarctica, not the Arctic Circle.  Keep in mind that each mile of atmospheric filtering (or the lack of it), mile by mile, constitutes a significant influence on the world’s weather.  Therefore, the sun related weather should be able to adequately account for the specific conditions in question here that exist at Antarctica, but they can not.

To establish the angle of "thermonic" or sunlight produced heat energy into the atmosphere, I used a computer to set the angles of entry.  I hope that my calculations are as accurate as I propose that they are. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L~~~~~~~ =======================================================================

=========================================================================
Now in relation to what you have just reviewed on the previous page, consider the massive earthquakes around the earth two thousand years ago as a phenomena showing the existence of such massive energy changes within the earth itself.

As further proof of these gravitational and magnetic forces having the ability to freeze matter, apart from and differently from the lack of sun, consider the following.  Around the perimeter of certain parts of the Antarctic ice cap live schools of fish, Tropical Fish, an amazing phenomena when you consider the fact that such creatures could not begin to survive in the oceans of the Arctic Circle or even the oceans of North America!  Warm fish in a cold (?) climate.  Right off of the ice cap!  And no, this is not the so-called volcanic activity nearby, for there are volcanoes active in the northern hemisphere, but you don’t find any tropical fish around Alaska, Canada, or even Washington state.  Additionally, bringing the idea that there is volcanic activity there which alone allows these tropical fish to exist there establishes another contradiction.  If volcanic activity is sufficient to be the cause of water temperatures capable of sustaining tropical fish, then by the logic of that very idea, the land mass itself should be considered to be heated up to a thermonic quantum sufficient to at least offer a thermonic resistance toward any purported scientific principle of freezing capacity as based on the land mass theory.

In fact, the continent of Antarctica exists where it does in reality because it was pulled there by shifting Gravitational forces (not simple magnetic ones) as they pulled the supercontinent Pangea apart.  And in further fact, the theory of "continental drift" as an explanation of how the continents all got to where they are today, does absolutely nothing to explain why they would up and break apart in the first place.  Think about it!.  Something would have had to have caused the separation of this proposed land mass into smaller components in the first place, for the separation of land from one adjoining land mass to become another land mass could not be brought about by a simple earthquake, or even a whole series of them (unless someone would like to propose a linear earthquakes theory effect, similar to that of splitting a diamond), and it is certain that these gigantic land masses (continents) did not simply separate spontaneously, or of their own volition.

The elimination of hurricanes as a dividing force would be obvious, and volcanoes would fare no better as a logical conclusion than the string of earthquakes focused linearly, unless someone would like to propose, as an alternative, linear volcanoes, or string after string of volcanoes, outlining the continental structures, all in a line together, suddenly exploding from within to produce a separation effect.  And as to the idea that this explosional, separational force came from deep within the center of the earth, such an explosive force moving outward would have destroyed the roundness of the earth, if not destroying the entire earth itself.  What other kind of forces could have done this?  Only forces of a massive Gravitational shifting nature could have done this.  No other forces are known to exist in the earth with enough power and magnitude to have accomplished such a task any other way.

And so it was with the land mass of Antarctica, pulled, not drifted (and certainly not pushed), all the way to the bottom of the earth, where due to its position in relation to the sun and other physics principles and facts, was exposed to a certain amount of natural heating of the area itself, in contrast to the great ice cap that is obviously there.  A massive amount of ice, signifying great cold, in conjunction and in contrast to a climate and an environment where Tropical Fish live and flourish right next to the ice capped continent itself.    Now, if that isn’t enough to present a convincing argument as to the actual warmth of the continent itself as well as the surrounding region thereof as contrasted by the amount of ice there, then take a good look at the land mass itself.  The land is considerably greenish at different times of the year!  And greatly uncovered!  Much land is actually exposed there, not covered by ice at all as one should be able to expect, considering the purely fantastic amount of ice retained there.  In other words, all of the land mass should be under ice; none of it should be exposed!  But much of it is exposed, and that is a fact.

Further, the idea that any part of the major warming of the South American continent is to any degree, largely caused by such things as the Gulf Stream or any other such stream can’t be borne out by the pure analytical truth, for the laws of physics, both of entropy and of thermal conductance - in relation to the insulative powers or thermal conductance resistance abilities of the earth itself (the earth or ground of the continental land mass acting as its own heat resistance insulation for the earth or ground further inland and all the way to the other side of the continent - Did anyone think to measure the other side of the continent to see if there was a drop in ground temperature?  If not, and yet the climatic temperatures is fairly the same on both sides of the continent, the Stream was not and is not actually that significant in heating the continental crust in the first place).  Further, the path of the Stream has changed and continues to change over the decades.  Therefore, this is not the answer, at all, to the long term, high-warm / extreme cold conditions in either the tropics or at the continent of Antarctica.

There are many other enlightening and further endorsing phenomena pertaining to and surrounding the continent of Antarctica, too many to go into fully here and for the purposes that this scientific disclosure is made.

Assessing what we have managed to logically understand and conclude on the foregoing matters presented to this point, we discover that there is a very unique and extremely powerful phenomena in nature, not being required to be artificially produced or man made, sufficient, more than sufficient in raw energy to cause the atomic and subatomic changes that can cause a drastic and sudden change in atomic decay of radioactive substances, more energy in fact than a dozen of the largest, finest, and most expensive of mankind’s most powerful atomic generators or nuclear reactors, and this raw power is being evidentially displayed in the scientific wonder of Antarctica with all of its 90 % of the earth’s ice, without a doubt, and It Is Not Going To Go Away, or vanish (just become someone wants it to), until it is time to make another massive uniforces' alignment and polar shift, which may be happening much sooner than many scientists fully realize or expect.

From these aspects, we come to understand what in nature, by the application of subatomic freezing caused by the greatest forces in the earth applied periodically, can cause a proton to suddenly become a neutron, overload the nucleus of the atom with a neutron charge, cause the nucleus to begin to pulsate, then dissipate, causing a rapid reduction of material at a rate far surpassing the atomic decay rate that would otherwise be prescribed to any particular radioactive element, accordingly.

With these true and correct understandings “under our belt,” we now come to fully realize that all forms (not just one or two) of radioactive dating are now rendered as totally unreliable for historical time dating purposes.  This area of geophysics, regardless of how badly certain scientists would like to object and hold on to the old dead theory of radioactive dating as a unimpeachable historical time clock, is dead.  With radioactive dating no longer being an option to reinforce the dogmatic theory of evolution, we must now turn to other more reliable sciences to take its place.  The two that are the most concrete at this point, like it or not, are (1) archeology and (2) genealogy.  Yes, now even genealogy comes back to us, but this time as a matter of historical science, inasmuch as it links one biological life span with another as a matter of deliberately established and kept records.

But wait, we must first provide one more detailed and objective focus on the subject of evolution, you know, that idea that mankind came first from a one celled creature, the ameba, and due to environmental influences and special scientific phenomena alleged to somehow exist but never discovered (even if such a thing could now be alleged to be discovered by some scientist on a singular basis, it would be extremely likely that such a theory would fail, for it would require the application of such still unknown phenomena to every form of creature that exists - bearing in mind that radioactive dating will not longer work here), supposedly this creature, the ameba, while working its way up and then sideways to evolve itself to other creatures not directly in the evolutionary lineup of man, worked its way up also to the ape, and from there, after a long, long time, became the human species that we are today.

However, we can no longer call upon those mind boggling amounts of time that evolutionists and the supreme Court of the United States were fond of pointing to and saying,” See there, it just took a few billion more years to go from that stage to that other stage of evolution.”  YOU, READER, WHETHER SCIENTIST OR STUDENT OR LAY PERSON, NOW KNOW, that the “neutron is really just a 'frozen' proton” and “Antarctica has 90 % of the Earth’s ice” - kind of thing.  Remember that?  You must remember that!  Now let us look to still another science and see if we can figure out where we are here.

Let us turn to the well established scientific logic of probabilities.  You know, that form of logical science that everyone desiring to follow the "evolutionary" theory followed as they applauded Mr. Spock of Star Trek; never did they doubt the applicability of the logic of probabilities then, for after all, Mr. Spock was supposedly a highly "evolved" Vulcan, wasn’t he. So if it was okay for an "evolved" person to be logical and rely upon the science of probabilities, then it must certainly be okay for us common, not so "evolved" folks to be scientifically logical and rely upon the science of probabilities also.

So we are going to get down to the bottom of this issue, scientifically, the way that Mr. Spock, along with a few thousand other evolutionist theory scientists have done, and see where it takes us.

Now, first eliminating forever all claims of radioactive dating as a science capable of supporting to any extent the theory of evolution, assessing the age of the earth, between archeology and genealogy to be only about twelve to thirteen thousand years old, we must now try to calculate the probabilities of evolution as any explanation of the origin of mankind by forcing the claim of all evolutionary changes into the foregoing limited, prescribed amount of time.

Inasmuch as there are no records anywhere showing where any person of intelligence and cognizance has witnessed a live change of one species into another, all such changes would have had to have been in secret, or hidden away from the note-taking eyes of mankind.  Of course amebas and the like could not take very good notes “in them days” could they?  Therefore, all proposed evolutionary changes, if there were to be any changes at all, would have had to have been along the line of occurring as a result of the special, yet still undiscovered, phenomena that would have to exist, the kind that I described earlier, that cold change one species into another in virtually the “twinkling of an eye” (sound familiar?), which would have had to have been applied to each and every form of species to be evolved into another species on an instant and secretive (or hidden from recorded history, but produced almost as if by magic - sound familiar again”) in order for our current civilization to exist at all.

Now remember, all of this must be done in around twelve to thirteen thousand years.  How can we begin to calculate the probabilities of these scientific factors that we are now provided with?  First of all, let us take the total number of the many types or forms of life known to exist upon planet Earth.  That would include fishes, birds, mammals - inclusive of humans in their different race forms, insects, germs, and all species that may fit somewhere in between.  I am sure that this would come to at least a total of ten thousand different life forms that we must account as to how they “evolved” to that exact stage, if “evolved” is how they got there.   Next, let us prescribe an acceptable number of years that might somehow take into account the species altering phenomena  that has never been discovered, say, 300 years, the number that we described earlier as being the outside number of years as to when the two magnetic poles change places (and quite a drop from the billions, or even millions of years required by evolutionists previously), thereby implying that the evolutionists’ final magic bullet to explain these dramatically accelerated changes would somehow be contained (although still quite hidden from society) in these energy changes.  Since according to evolutionists, all of these different species changed to other specie form on a separate basis, we are being more than generous, more than scientifically fair when we only multiply the 10,000 minimum of creatures or different life forms by the number of 300 years.  The result of this factor is only 3,000,000 years.  Sorry, but that exceeds the twelve to thirteen thousand years that we must now force our little scenario into.  And remember, I have given the evolutionist the benefit of the doubt that there might be some strange phenomena somewhere in nature that would change all of these many species, on a routine and deliberate basis, in the twinkling of an eye (there goes that familiar thing again).

Since it is impossible to cram three million years into twelve to thirteen thousand years, we must try to obtain our probability factor another way (since some people don’t know how to accept the calculation of “impossible” when it applies to the issue of evolution).  Let’s be kind to the evolutionists again, and divide three-hundred  into the three million, instead of the other way around.  In doing it that way, we come up with the number of ten-thousand (10,000).  Further, bear in mind that there are at least 10,000 different life forms to account for here, so since they must all be accounted for by this miraculous new-required (hmmm, miraculous, miracle.  Wonder where that idea comes from) transformation, the numerical value of ten thousand must be factored with the number of ten-thousand (10,000) as to the number of probabilities of evolution existing as a matter of actual science whereby the origin of mankind can be and should be factually, legally explained, on a one to product outcome basis.  Ten-thousand times ten-thousand comes to one-hundred-million (100,000,000).  As a matter of probabilities then, this would mean that the chances that evolution exists as a viable and factually explanative science is approximately one (1) in one-hundred-million (100,000,000).

In reverse logical form, that would mean that there are about one-hundred-million (that’s 100,000,000) chances or probabilities that God is real as to the one chance that He is not.

Of course, I sill lean on the first analysis as being the more factual and true answer, or result, from these problematic calculations.  That is, it is impossible, absolutely impossible, to cram 3,000,000 years into 12,000 to 13,000 years, which would render the probability that evolution as a viable science exists to the impossible-to- infinity degree, and would render conversely the probability that God does not exist to the impossible-to-infinity degree, and would mean as a matter of deductive scientific logic that the probability that God does exist rises to an absolute-to-infinity degree, absolutely.

There, now it has been said, finally.  The Theory (never a true science) Of Evolution Is Dead!  It has no more viable scientific substance to rely upon for its scientifically factual basis.  The sciences which have taken its place paint a different story.  God absolutely, scientifically, beyond any factual doubt, IS real, and is very much alive, for based upon the other scientific and historical and political phenomena that are still occurring, it would be impossible that He not be.   As to the form that God exists in, my studies abroad strongly indicate that the actual existence of God is of a man-form nature, but I believe and project that He is to be considered as an extremely advanced man of absolute, universal knowledge (He has all possible knowledge) of all of the sciences that exist, both those known to us and many sciences not yet known to us.  This explains his “powers” which are not at all magic, or anything akin to it.  His powers are scientific and are scientifically real, just as He is scientifically real.  He uses true and complete sciences, all of them, to bring about the things that He does.  Thus, in this most advanced state of existence, he must be scientific because he is absolutely scientifically real, and always was.

Nothing unscientific about God, the word “God” simply denoting “one placed in authority as a formal official over an entire planet or else a specified portion of the universe.”  The scriptures and other records are full of indications that God is of this awesome man-like character and nature, but still with an awesomeness that demands to be respected and revered.  And in all likelihood, He even has a companion of the feminine gender.  That would explain who he knew to pattern Eve’s body after, since it was implied that the man Adam’s body was designed like unto His own.

Of course, one of the doorways of hocus pocus that many evolutionists rely upon with their funny and light headed ideas is the claim that, as a way of explaining how all of the changes might have occurred if simply given enough time, and to combine the excessive time needed for such changes with some sort of explanation of the beginning of the universe as we know it to be, evolutionists came up with the claimed "Big Bang" theory, which I now, at this link,  have proceeded to expose here and to destroy all credible reliance upon this ill conceived "scientific" concoction.   When you have reviewed it in the website "video" format that I have provided, return here for the final word on this dire subject of enlightenment, that you may know the beginnings of your existence, that you may come to understand these things as they are, not as people would like them to be.

To expose this whole error in both governmental law as well as scientific law further, I provide you now a short review of an area of the so called theory of EVOLUTION, long overdue, which provides for the serious reader a new understanding of the falsity of that alleged science at the most practical level of all, the review of the requirements of logic as applied to the life of the ameba as it tries to evolve to its next stage as required of it by the "environmental influence" theories of Charles Darwin.  When you have finished it, you will come to realize the utter absurdity of the part of the sciences known as "biology" or "zoology" or even "botany" as they purport to connect to the so called theory of evolution, in having to review and "learn," as though all a part of the evolutionary process, all of the different classes, phyla, sub-phyla, species, etc., all forced upon the people of this nation and this world by a corrupted government structure gone entirely mad.  Unfortunately for these people, God, who is entirely quite real, and has an actual purpose in mind for all of this, is also mad, in a different, angry type way, and is moving more swiftly than the bad people even know or suspect, to bring them down low, where they shall trouble His people, wherever they may be found, no more.  This, as only an humble servant doing what I can, promise you is exactly the truth of things as they are.

Radioactive Dating and all alleged Evolution science subsequent thereto Is Dead.  God Is Alive, very much so.  This means that all evolutionists, atheists, and agnostics are in serious trouble.  Serious trouble.  As are all judges of all courts everywhere who have deliberately suppressed the knowledge of God and worship of Him; such worship and reverence as did the Founders of our United States and the Framers of our Constitution pay unto the scientific builder of this world.  These judges of today are in very deep trouble, and you can count on it.

AND NOW THAT YOU ARE AWARE OF THESE THINGS, OUGHT YOU NOT TO BE AWARE ALSO THAT ALL THAT YOU SAY AND DO ARE BEING WATCHED AND HEARD?  THESE THINGS HAVE BEEN SAID TO YOU, AND HAVE COME FORTH UNTO YOU TO COUNTERACT THE TERRIBLE DESTRUCTION THAT HAS COME ABOUT DUE TO DARWINISM AND EVOLUTION, DUE TO ATHEISM AND AGNOSTICISM, AND DUE TO THE DECISIONS OF CORRUPT AND CORRUPTED COURTS WHO HAVE DENIED THE POWER AND AUTHORITY OF GOD THEREIN.

I HAVE SPOKEN UNTO YOU OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE CELESTIAL CONSTITUTION IN MY PUBLICATIONS CONTAINED AT THE SITE DESIGNATED AS "UNTO."   I HAVE TOLD YOU THAT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES IS AUTHORIZED UNDER THE CELESTIAL CONSTITUTION.  I HAVE TRIED TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT THAT MEANS, THAT CERTAIN PRINCIPLES AS CONTAINED IN THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ARE THEREFORE ETERNAL IN THEIR NATURE, AND ONE OF THOSE ABOVE ALL IS THE PRINCIPLE OF DUE PROCESS.

YOU HAVE BEEN TAUGHT TO BELIEVE, WRONGFULLY, THAT THE ISSUE OF DUE PROCESS ONLY COUNTS IN COURT OR POLITICS.  YOU HAVE BEEN LEAD TO BELIEVE THAT A LITTLE BREAKAGE HERE AND A LITTLE BREAKAGE THERE IS OF NO REAL HARM.  BUT I SAY UNTO YOU NOW, THAT THERE ARE THE BREAKAGE OF MANY LOWER LAWS THAT FALL UNDER THE BREAKAGE OF THE HIGHER LAW OF DUE PROCESS.  STEALING IS THE TAKING OF A THING WITHOUT DUE PROCESS.  ADULTERY IS THE TAKING OF A THING WITHOUT DUE PROCESS.  MURDER IS THE TAKING OF LIFE WITHOUT DUE PROCESS, DUE PROCESS THAT IS JUSTIFIABLE BEFORE MANKIND, AND ULTIMATELY JUSTIFIABLE BEFORE GOD.  AND CHEATING, LYING, GOSSIPING, AND MANY OTHER THINGS, FALL UNDER THE SCOPE OF THE POWER AND AUTHORITY OF DUE PROCESS.

AND ALL OF THESE THINGS APPLY IN OUR DAILY LIVES AS WELL AS TO OTHER THINGS WE MIGHT PERCEIVE AND DO.  AND IN CASE YOU WERE NOT AWARE OF IT BEFORE THIS, DUE PROCESS ALSO APPLIES TO OUR SPIRITUAL LIVES, OUR SPIRITUAL CONDUCT, NOT JUST OUR TEMPORAL CONDUCT.

WHEREFORE, THINK CAREFULLY UPON THESE THINGS, FOR GOD IS REAL, SCIENTIFICALLY, AND EVOLUTION IS DEAD, FOR A CONTINENT CANNOT BE HIDDEN.  KNOW YOU NOT THAT EVERYWHERE THAT YOU GO AND IN EVERYTHING THAT YOU DO, THESE CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES HOLD TRUE?  SHOULD YOU NOT THEREFORE BEGAN TO BE SOBER AGAIN IN ALL OF YOUR DOINGS, THAT YOU CEASE YOUR STEALINGS IN HOLY PLACES, THAT YOU RETURN NOW TO GOD AND CEASE YOUR WANDERINGS AWAY FROM HIM, THAT YOU SEEK NOT TO GO INTO PLACES THAT ARE SACRED OR REVERED BEFORE THE LORD, AND THEREIN TO THINK EVIL THOUGHTS AND TO DO EVIL, AND TOUCH UPON THOSE THINGS IN YOUR HEART THAT ARE UNCLEAN, YOU THAT BEAR THE VESSELS OR THE TRUE LIGHT OF THE LORD?

FOR YOU THAT HAVE TO THIS DAY GONE FORWARD IN SOME FAITH BUT MUCH DOUBT BECAUSE OF ATHEISM AND THE ERROR OF TEACHING OF EVOLUTION SHALL NO LONGER BE JUSTIFIED IN THESE THINGS, FOR AS IT WOULD BE SAID UNTO YOU IN LEGAL TERMS IN A COURT OF LAW, "YOU HAVE CONSTRUCTIVE KNOWLEDGE, AND ARE THEREFORE ACCOUNTABLE UNTO ALL OF THESE THINGS, ACCOUNTABLE UNTO HIM THAT MADE YOU, FOR YOU DID NOT MAKE YOURSELF."

THE TIME GROWS SHORT, AND THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN IS CLOSE AT HAND.  AND JESUS CHRIST AND NONE OTHER HAS THE LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO REIGN OVER THIS NATION OF THE UNITED STATES, AND ALSO OVER THE WORLD, FOR ALL COUNTRIES HAVE CONSTITUTIONS ALSO, WHICH DERIVE THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE SAME CELESTIAL CONSTITUTION THAT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WAS FIRST INSPIRED UNDER.

KNOW THEN THAT THESE THINGS ARE TRUE, AND ARE BROUGHT BEFORE YOU FOR YOUR GOOD AND FOR YOUR PROFIT, THAT THESE BAD THINGS OF THE WORLD AND THESE BAD THINGS OF GOVERNMENT MIGHT BE DONE AWAY.  AMEN.