I am going to approach this disclosure by laying certain fundamental planks in the floor that it is founded upon in order that you, the reader, and you, the king and ruler, may understand each thing, point by point, as it is made to unfold in front of you here.  There are many things in this world that are considered to be – heavy. You may count this as being one of them.

Throughout history, many authors of a work or an act for which they wish to be able to claim credit for or victory through, for some cause or reason or the other, have secretly signed their name into their work in order that it might ultimately be known who the real power was behind that work, so that they might be able to claim the glory, or vain-glory as it were, for such said work.

Among these authors, as pertaining to the workers employed by one King James, accredited historical author of the famous King James Bible, was one also famous William Shakespeare, writer and among the great scholars of the time.  As far as is known, who all of the great scholars were that King James called upon to do the translation work from the original texts for him, is not known, but it is believed that William Shakespeare may have been one of them.

Because of Shakespeare’s propensity to take credit for his work when and where he could, a certain study indicates the possibility that he may have contributed toward the King James Bible’s translation.  This speculation has come about largely for one reason. If one were to go into the Bible, King James, and go to the 46th chapter of the Book of Psalms and, starting from the beginning word of that chapter, count 46 words forward, one would come upon the word "shake."  Then, going to the end of the chapter but not counting the word "Selah" there (Selah was an automatic sort of word that was akin to "play it again Sam," or "strike up the band again," used routinely by King David), and starting counting word by word backward from that last word in the chapter, we would find the word "spear," without the "e" on the end of course. So the 46th word forward and the 46th word backward brought together in the 46th Chapter of Psalms would spell shakespear, which could signify Shakespeare as one of the input author’s of the time that worked on the "Holy Bible" now most used worldwide.  Whether this is so or not, it simply reflects the way that some authors of particular works have been known to secretly encode their signature into a particular cause or work that they wish to be able to claim credit for later, whether that credit would be good or bad as we might see it.

Back in the late 1980’s, I had a friend that, while Christian in background, was somewhat Jewish by descent, who had an occasion to travel over to Israel, where he attended the University of Israel for about 2 years, and studied many things directly from ancient Hebrew texts, reviewed from the Jewish perspective.  Among those things that he studied, he brought over to me the story of how the ancient Jewish accounting goes as it pertains to Lucifer in the Old Testament of the Bible. The Jewish version is, to say the least, intriguing.

Instead of his name being Lucifer, his name is, English rendition, Heyllel (the Hebrew script for this is too difficult to write), signifying "shining one," or "shining with pride" or "light showing pride;" this particular rendition of the word, according to Jewish scripture on the matter, signified "light’ in a "show-off" or prideful kind of fashion.  According to this particular accounting, Heyllel, upon being cast down to the earth, changed his name to "Saton," which English translation of is currently "Satan."  This accounting shows that Lucifer or Heyllel, whichever one you look to for identification, had and has control of his own name, and can change that name at any time to be whatever he wants it to be.

It is established in the ancient scriptures that God has many names which describe Him as to His person.  He is designated as Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, also known as Emanuel, which means God with us, and Jesus, His son, is known as the Son of man; we see the name "man" inside of the word Emanuel, and we are caused to recognize that the word "man" is also one of His descriptive names.  He is also called Wonderful, and Prince of Peace, and Counselor, because by His very nature, He stands for peace and counsels and brings us peace who believe in Him.  A "human" means literally "low man" or "serving man" – "hu" being from the word "humble" which denotes one being low or lower, and born to serve.  Gautama Sakyamuni is the man, born as a prince in the palace of India in about 600 B.C., who became known as the first Buddha ever.  This is not a word that was already known to the Hindu’s of the time; Gautama Sakyamuni made it up for himself and gave that word its first definition, for when the Hindu’s questioned him as to whether he was or not a "deva," or devil, his reply was that he was a "Buddha, which means enlightened one."   "Much like Lucifer, or Heyllel, Gautama Sakyamuni changed his name, and his destiny.

At this time, I would like to focus on a particular word, a word that describes an emotion or feeling, but not an emotion of peace or joy or happiness.  It is a word of anger, great anger.  It is a word that has been used to describe persons throughout the ages, both evil and righteous, as this feeling has been applied to a particular reason or cause or mission.  As far as the righteous are concerned, it is a word that does not dominate their lives, for the righteous, following in the footsteps of God, or in His son, Jesus Christ, live their lives dictated more by love than by any other form of emotion.

If we were to regard this particular word as being associated with either Satan or Christ as to being ever-regarded so because of the type of meaning derived from the word, it is a word, because of that meaning, that would be applied to Satan, not Jesus Christ, and not God.

The word "wrathful" is a word that means, "full of wrath" or anger.  A righteous wrath is directed justly at the thing done more than at the person who did it, where forgiveness is given when it can be given, and a righteous wrath does not continue to the extent that it consumes its host, turning the anger into pure hatred, the kind of hatred that can and does kill, commits murder, of the most innocent and harmless of beings, that pits brother against brother and sister against sister, all in the name of gain and vain-glory, without conscience, as though the same were Satan himself.

But an unrighteous wrath, or one full of wrath, does these evil things until, if not repented of ere it is too late, consumes its host until the host is revealed as nothing less than pure hatred for all mankind, even if that hatred is not revealed to the knowing or understanding eye of the people of the world.

The word that we are to focus on is not either "wrath" or "wrathful," but one akin to it. It is the word "wroth," the act of being consumed as a motive of great anger, even to the point of feeling hate, combined with the act itself of being wrathful, or full of wrath.

As we look at the word "wroth," we find that it is used for the very first time in connection with Cain and his hatred and desire to murder his brother, Abel.  We find the word first in the 4th chapter of Genesis, 5th verse, wherein it says:

"And Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell." (emphasis added).

At this point we find that Cain is "wroth" to an extreme level or degree, because God has not respected his offering, which offering was in violation of God’s apparent commandment that Cain sacrifice the lamb in semblance of the only begotten who was to come forth in the meridian of time. Cain’s offering was a pretense; Cain knew that he could do better, but he already had a hatred for his own brother, who served God with all of his heart, though Cain did not.  And, recognizing the pure murderous hatred present in Cain, before the murder to come of itself had happened, the Lord God marked Cain as one to become a son of perdition, or a follower of Satan and his other angels, by placing before him a question that describes Cain’s state of heart, that state of heart also becoming descriptive of his name as a follower of Satan, for of all of the earth, Satan himself is the most Wroth of all.  Indisputable fact.

The 6th verse says, "And the Lord said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth?" (emphasis added).  In a latter day, or modern English, transformation of that question, we would read it as "Why are you wroth?"

Clearly, the word "wroth" as where it is all consuming of a person with ultimate and unquenchable hatred and a lust for murder, and a lack of conscience or remorse of the living can only be applied as though a name to Satan; it can never be applied in that manner to God or to His Son, Jesus Christ, nor can it be applied to His servants, no matter how righteously angry they may become from time to time.  Wroth, then, is another name for Satan, for Satan IS Wroth ABSOLUTELY!

In showing possessiveness of a thing in our wording or grammar, we use the apostrophe and the letter "s" as the way to do that.  To show possessiveness of the word "Wroth" as a name, it would be written "Wroth’s," and to shown possessiveness of the name "Satan," it would be written as "Satan’s."  Even at times where one accidentally omits the apostrophe, we can still see the possessive nature of a word itself just by looking at how it is written and how it is associated.  Therefore, even if a word omits the apostrophe, it does not disguise the possessiveness of the word itself.  We know this to be true.  Now, men have children, though Satan, being an outcast evil spirit from heaven, has never actually or literally had children; all of his children are at best symbolic.  Still, to the degree that Satan can manifest himself into any person upon this earth and cause within them a pure hatred and murderous ability like unto his own, he has children.

As we look at the word "child," we find that by putting that word along with the word Wroth’s, we have the two words "Wroth’s child," and by doing that along with the word Satan’s, we have the word "Satan’s child." Wroth’s child and Satan’s child, for the foregoing reasons stated, would be interchangeable.  NOW, let’s do the foreseeable, discernable.  Let’s put the words "Wroth’s" and "child" together; we have the word "Wroth’schild." By that same token, if we put the word "Satan’s" and "child" together, we have the word "Satan’s child (or Satan’schild).  "ONE MORE STEP, we remove the apostrophe, and remove also the "W" in the word/name "Wroth’s," rendering it as "Roths, we now have, finally, Rothschild.  This would be synonymous to Satan’s child by interpretation.  The Rothschild family of old time Europe is one of the most famous or infamous families of all time; it is long known to be the most powerful and wealthiest families upon the earth, and the most murderous.  This, then, is a form of hidden "signature" of its true author, much like the works of certain authors contain their signature hidden or incorporated within the work itself to identify who the true originator was or is in case they should ever want to claim credit for it.

Thus, that name’s history goes to the fact that its progenitor, Meyer Amschel "Rothschild," (1743-1812), born in Frankfurt Germany, was and is the founder of all modern illusionary banking (money exchange business), banking that uses the illusion that "a promise to pay" should be treated the same as though the pay itself, and that by doing such a thing, it is "okay" to fractionalize and monetize the value of that which is to be paid out, or promised to pay but not actually paid.

Rising to tremendous financial strength and power by use of this fraudulent system, the Rothschild (Satan’s child) family showed forth unto the world their murderous ability, like unto Cain, but in such numbers as to put Cain to utter shame or envy, for this depraved family financed wars, but not just wars, but both sides of the wars, without caring for which side won or lost, done all in the name of greed or lust for money, and thereby pitted brother against brother, sister against sister, mother against mother, father against father, and child against child.  Can it be said of that family any less than they are in deed monsters?  Perdition made manifest?  Satan’s children?  And their entire banking system along with them? In other words, to proclaim the first "Rothschild" is and was literally to proclaim the "Son of Satan," and those who serve Satan's Son, his "child, also serve Satan himself!  It is said that the "Rothschild" family is Jewish, but I have looked long and carefully at this situation, and I will tell you now that I do not believe that the name "Rothschild" is of actual ancient Hebrew origin, but is a name that was created, much like the name Buddha was created by its true author, far in the future after the Jewish nation first fell into the hands of the gentile nations.

I say this for a number of reasons, one being that I have found no word in the ancient scriptures that is akin to it in form, except for the word "rot" or "rotten," and another reason being that it is unimaginable that any self respecting Jew or Hebrew of any age or era would electively choose to establish their surname as being one akin to the word "Wroth" and then attach the word "child" with it, narrowly looking also at the fact that the word "child," as a part of the Rothschild family name, is not even a Jewish word by that sound, but is in fact of English origin, noth German, not Hebrew.

In fact, on a more concrete note, I write the report from an encyclopedia, which declares the truth of the origin of the name as follows: "Rothschild, a prominent banking family, whose name derives from the red (rot) shield (shilt) that was the ensign of the original Rothschild bank."  [The University Society Encyclopedia-1972].  You see, even the historical accounting of the name does not render it as a true Jewish name, the letter "c," so critical in "Rothschild," does not appear in "red" or "rot" or "shield" or "shilt," only when crossing the word over to the English side does the name pick up the letter "c," no accident, and while the word "red" as in the German form of "rot" is not to be construed as being a derivative of "rotten," nevertheless, the amount of red innocent blood that these people have caused to be spilled over the centuries, all in the name of money and vain-glory, makes it a rotten name to the core.

In reality, all things considered, it is likely that the true name of birth of Meyer Amschel Rothschild was only Meyer Amschel, and the name of Rothschild, alleged to be only a representative of the words "red" and "shield," when crossed to the English as Rothschild (no longer bearing any real semblance to red shield), bore the cleverly disguised words (just as with "shake" "spear") of "Satan’s child," or "Wroth’s child.  It should also be noted here that a "red shield" is symbolic of a shield or field of blood, or of murder, even if under a claim of righteousness.  Satan is all too clever, isn’t he?   It should be further understood that the word red appears in English without an "h" and is not pronounced with an "h," so to add an "h" into the "Rot" word had to signify something, and that something was the pronouncement of Satan's own form of punishment upon mankind, or that is "h"ell, or hell.  Also "h"ate, which Satan is consumed with.  Additionally, importantly, there is no "c" in the English version of shield, and with all of that being considered, there is yet another insight here that must be considered:

If the German constructed word of Rotshilt, from the Rot Shilt or Red Shield coat of arms," were to be translated over into the English as such, either then or now, and was meant to be construed just that way, then how is it that the Rothschild name - in its English production or rendition, is not still pronounced in its German translated version, even though in English?  I am talking about the pronunciation of it, understand?  Not the spelling of it!

That is, why would the family name not be referred to as the "Redshield" family (English verbal translation) , and not Rothschild, which changes the very verbal pronunciation of the word "shilt" or shield itself to come out as child, which is nowhere close in pronunciation to the word "shield" or "shilt?"  The answer is obvious, someone, some dark power, wanted to put his signature into his work, his authorship of power, his acts, and his name was and is . . . Satan, or Saton, or Heylel or Lucifer, yes, the actual Devil himself.

It should be noted that the splitting of the name itself is spoken purely as "child" on the end of the name, which bears absolutely no resemblance in either the spoken version or the written version of its original German counterpart! Accident?  "Bloody unlikely" as the British themselves would be prone to say.

The fore part of the name, "Rot" might fare better in being crossed over to "Red," for we do sense a "d" sound when pronounced, but when we place an "h" at the end, it softens it a good bit, as if someone is trying to hide something, not wanting to attract too much attention to anything RED, for red, whether spoken or written or appearing as a color, attracts attention and most often signifies Blood, particularly when associated with a weapon of war such as a Shield.

Look at and compare the two separations: "Rot / shilt" . . . . . . . . "Roths / child." If we push the "s" over to the "Rot," and even add an "h," how do we qualify the remainder, "hilt," which now no longer has that "s" to hinge its most vital structure as a word for "shield," but instead in its place we are presented with the letter "c," which is nowhere in the British formation for "shield," but is - PRIMA FACIE - the formation of a definite English word that gives us the word for a young human, the one thing that Satan never was and never will be.  Clearly, the logical path for translation of the chosen name has been left for a wayward path, which considering the British pride in being proper and correct, even though their language was known to stray a bit at times, casts extraordinary suspicion and doubt upon the name Rothschild as anything but a contrived name whose true and secretly hidden purpose was to represent its most ultimate author, Satan, or Heylel, or Lucifer, himself.

It is not surprising to learn that at least two places in the scriptures it refers to "the children of wrath," wrath being a derivation of the word "wroth."  One scripture in Ephesians 2: 3 in particular contains very peculiar wording, Paul speaking of all of the people of that day, stating "Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." (emphasis added).  Who were those "others" that Paul talked about, for they, the "others," were not to be considered as a part of the "all" of that day.

No doubt those "others" had special recognition as to their consuming nature of hate and vengeance as a heavenly or Godly matter, otherwise why bother to mention those "others" at all?  Such "others" were likely being referred to thusly because of their level of hate and vengeance, such an other as Cain, the first murderer of the earth, he having been pinned with the concept of being "wroth" directly by the Lord God Himself, the condition of being "wroth" being a heavier form of the condition of being full of hate and vengeance, or wrathful. This would also apply to those "others" who, like Cain, have chosen to follow a path of planned murders, even if under the pretense of some righteous war, of the children of the earth, for all of the children of this earth belong to God, who is scientifically real, and very much alive, and growing in a righteous wrath of His own, for all of these things that ought not to have been.

It should, then, come as no additional surprise to learn that in the previous scriptural passage, Ephesians 2: 2, it refers to Satan as the "prince of the power of the air." Satan has always thought of himself as "clever", and when one considers that he prides himself of his control over the air, it is all too clever that the way the fraudulent moneychanger system works with the world bankers is by creating money out of thin air. (See the Justice Mahoney case with First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota vs. Jerome Daley (1968).

Consider this.  Abraham was given a blessing of the Lord God that he, Abraham, and all his descendants would be blessed for his own righteousness’ sake; the Lord did not limit that blessing to one generation only, nor anywhere in the world Abraham’s descendants might exist.  The Lord gives blessings to people and their posterity oftentimes, and while not necessarily in monetary form, are done for the pure purposes of the Lord himself.  Now, consider this also. Somewhere back in that darkened time between 1743 and 1812, the time of Meyer Amschel [Rothschild], Meyer Amschel appears to have entered into a pact or an agreement, a contract with the devil, or Satan, to change his, Amschel’s, name to that name of corrupt power, representing a field of blood, which stands for murder and great carnage, in exchange for his [Rothschild’s/Satan’s child’s] family (or generations) throughout all ages, having certain terrible murderous worldwide power, and enormous wealth beyond the imagination of all, for as of yet, I have not found a poor Rothschild, but those of whom I have made contact with all seem to have mysterious trusts or financial arrangements that take care of them - all of their lives, even if they have no idea where the money for their lifelong income is coming from.

More recently I discovered something that has taken many people aback to realize.  It is concernd with a formerly unknown economic factor that I refer to as MAFE, which stands for Money Available For Earning. MAFE must be considered as a part of the national (and international) money supply, and when there is not enough MAFE in the economy at all times, people suffer and nations crumble to pieces and fall to the ground.

I further discovered that, due to the existence of MAFE combined with the monetizing of promissory notes and issuing "checkbook" money created on the books of the banks and other financial institutions, because the interest legal structured therein causes the payback to increase marginally, the average 2.5 times increase over time causes a gigantuous private debt deficit of, a deficit that can never be compensated for by the banks in any legitimate manner, except that they must compensate for the deficiency by making more false or checkbook money loans, which must then be covered for by making yet more checkbook money loans, and so on until it reaches saturation.  And yes, if you are saying to yourself, sounds like a Ponzi Scheme, you are absolutely right, for the end relies upon the beginning, with nothing solid are sound to support it anywhere in between.  False in the beginning, false in the end.

However, it never reaches saturation, at least enough to be realized by the people at large, because the Federal Reserve System pulls back on bank authorized reserves, forces the banks to quit producing so much checkbook money, which then causes the private deficit arrears to begin to catch up with the current production of the same, and like a speeding object being forced suddenly to a halt, the results are spelled catastrophe and ruin for thousands, if not millions, every time it is done.  This deliberate cover up is hailed buy the economists as a natural economic cycle or downturn, but it is not.  The 1929 Depression was the Federal Reserve Bank’s first attempt to stifle the growing tendency toward saturation, but being their first time in unquestioned power, they overdid it; today they know better and only plan for recessions, not depressions, but they still plan them just the same.

A gigantic, worldwide Ponzi, RUINING businesses and lives indiscriminately, unconscionably.  It really doesn’t matter who you are, or how far up the ladder you have climbed, if you are caught in the wrong industry at the time when it is "necessary" for the Federal Reserve Bank to pull back on ITS special aside money supply (not the one, the dollar-notes, produced for Congress), then either your readjustment in living and lifestyle or else your utter ruin are imminent.

In all of this, I met a gentleman, a former bank president and former bank owner, who, being a Christian, shut his bank down, because, as he put it to me, "It’s all a sham," and when I spoke to him of the need to overthrow the moneychangers, he responded that he had gone back into the Old Testament of the Bible and there, took account over the fact that the Lord had on a number of occasions had to chastise the nation, Israel, for allowing the use of false weights and measures.

In fact, I have to tell you that, after having investigated this matter and come to the conclusion that the whole banking system is a gigantic, government protected Ponzi, at the time that I determined to impart my new found insight to this gentleman, former bank president and owner, before I could say it to him, he told me first, "It’s a Ponzi." !

For once I was stunned by his sudden disclosure, but I knew from his statement that I had done well and true in my own discernment of this most grave matter.

And so the evil continues to spread, and entrench itself into societies all over the earth, and bring about ruin and finance wars, both sides, causing much bloodshed, and much spiritual, not just physical, destruction thereby.  And the evil comes from none other than Satan’s child, or Roths-child.

Is it any wonder why there is a need to purge the earth of it before the Lord comes again, to prepare the way for His return?  Those of us who can serve as forerunners to His very real return must do what they can to prepare the way, which includes finding a way to overturn this most corrupt and false money system, and replace it with a real value system that the Lord Himself would approve of.

The construction of the Rothschild name was no accident; neither is the occurrence of so many continuous recessions and depressions around the world, for it is the design of its author that it should be that way, for as it was once stated to me by a goodly minister in these last days - - "Satan has his power in depression."

This message that I send out to you now, you dignitaries and rulers and high government officials of many nations, that you should be made aware of these things, as they are relevant to you and your respective economies, every one.  And you should do all that you can to distance yourself and your banks from this tragedy of tragedies, for the Lord will surely not bless you if you know to do it and you do it not.  Shore up your countries and fortify them from within against this great financial curse.  I have labored long and hard to bring to you, not only this understanding, but the understanding as contained in The Sunday Plan, that your economies may one day be solved and your people healed.  I pray that you can make use of it, and that your economies become redeemed as a result of it.  If you do so, give Him, even the Lord Jesus Christ, the credit for it, for were it not for Him, I would have had no understanding of these things to begin with.

The Roths-child family, the family behind both the Federal Reserve Banks and the Swiss International Banking system, the founder of the "moneychangers" of these last days, has, using their fictitious money producing system, subjugated the world into economic slavery, or unsolvable debt, which is what the fractionalizing and 'money creating by debt' banking system does, for at the end of each part of each and every fraction exists a very real person who is subject to pay, not repay, unto that same banking system created by the Rothschild (Satan’s child), money, money that the human economic slave, like at the end of a financial rope, must earn by his or her own efforts, to feed the money down the fractionalized channel unto the waiting banker, such banker, even if not truthfully knowing, being a servant of the child of Satan, Satan’s child, Rothschild. And still, the Rothschild family finances wars and rumors of wars, and cares not which side wins or loses, and still is encumbered by the curse of Cain, that he, Cain, sought to murder his innocent brother, in cold blood, without either conscience or remorse.

But the curse shall come upon that family, and any and all who follow or serve them, except they repent, and it is by these measures that I implore you, you rulers of nation, that you seek to renounce that evil empire and its ways, and seek to adopt The Sunday Plan and its ways, and to close the doors of the kingdom wherein you have unlawfully reigned by way of your contract, which has long since expired since the beginning of the earth.

And prepare yourselves to come under a Constitutional government which shall come, not of the one world order that has with evil intent proclaimed itself, but of the United States of America, which Constitutional government shall make itself available to you in the own due time of the Lord, and you shall be made a nation or a stately State of the United States of America, and America shall be extended unto you where you are, and your neighboring nations along with you, until America shall cover the earth, and freedom shall ring forever more, and God shall reign upon the earth, even Christ, who has brought about these understandings that you may know, for without Him nothing that is known could have been known.

Dismiss yourself from your robes and crowns of vain-glory, and make yourselves ready for a Constitutional government to come unto you in pure form, more pure than it has yet been upon this earth, that by its coming you may know, for it is His gift of governmental peace unto you, or as I have understanding that it is to be.

I am only a servant; regard me no more than such.  I beg of you, this.  But there are also many other servants of the one true God.  And I am thankful for such.

These things I say, with fear and trembling, in the sacred name of Jesus Christ, Amen.